Ethical & Unethical Behavior
Christian Business Ethics
Collusion
Violence
The estimate is sitting on his screen and he did not write it.
Eleven lines. Ten of them are exactly right. One of them — a shop-supply charge, a labor allowance, a part marked up past what anybody would call standard — is padded, and he knows which line it is because he has been in this trade eleven years and the number is simply not what that number should be.
The customer will not know. Cannot know. Nobody outside this building could look at that document and find the line. It is not illegal, nobody will audit it, and if he raised it he would be the guy who raised it.
He hits send.
He did not pad it. He did not decide to pad it. He does not personally receive one dollar of it. And he is now the reason it reached a person who trusted the document.
Ethical & Unethical Behavior
"You shall not curse the deaf or put a stumbling block before the blind, but you shall fear your God: I am the LORD" — Leviticus 19:14
Two crimes, and they are chosen with care. The deaf man never hears the curse. The blind man never sees who set the stone. Neither victim can detect that anything was done to him, neither can identify who did it, and neither will ever be in a position to complain.
Which means there is no earthly reason not to do it. There is no witness, no consequence, no reputational cost, no legal exposure. The verse gives one reason and only one: but you shall fear your God.
That is the whole territory of this room. Every real ethical question is a question about what a man does with an advantage the other party cannot see.
Everything before this was weighed on ground a man largely governs — what he said, what he promised, who he is at his own table. Here it leaves the property. Now it is other people's money, contracts that outlast the conversation, and a stranger who has no means of verifying a single figure in front of him.
The Man Who Cannot Check
Almost every transaction a man participates in is lopsided. One side knows the trade and the other does not.
The mechanic knows what the part costs. The contractor knows what the framing behind the drywall actually looks like. The agent knows how long the listing has been sitting. The lender knows which fee is negotiable. The advisor knows what he earns on the product he is recommending. The seller of the truck knows why he is selling the truck.
None of that is wrongdoing. It is the ordinary condition of a specialized world, and it is unavoidable — a man cannot become an expert in every trade he has to buy from. Which means civilization runs on the assumption that most men will not exploit the gap. Not that they cannot. That they will not.
"Cursed be anyone who misleads a blind man on the road"
— Deuteronomy 27:18).
Read the verb. Not robs. Not strikes. Misleads — and specifically, misleads a man who came to him for direction. The blind man asked. He was answered. He walked confidently in the wrong direction, and he thanked the man who pointed him, and he will never connect what happens next to the person who caused it.
That is the exact shape of ordinary commercial wrong. Nobody gets robbed. Somebody gets directed, by a person who knew better, and goes off thanking him.
And before any man settles comfortably on the seller's side of this, the record is not one-sided.
"'Bad, bad,' says the buyer, but when he goes away, then he boasts"
— Proverbs 20:14
Three thousand years old and still exactly how it goes. He runs the thing down in front of the man who owns it — points out the wear, sighs at the mileage, makes a face at the asking price — and then gets in his own truck and calls his brother to say what he got it for. The manipulation ran in the other direction that time, and it is the same offense.
Here is what the clean version looks like, and it is worth reading because it is unusual.
"Abraham listened to Ephron, and Abraham weighed out for Ephron the silver that he had named in the hearing of the Hittites, four hundred shekels of silver, according to the weights current among the merchants" — Genesis 23:16
Every detail is doing something. Ephron had publicly offered him the field for free — a courtesy nobody expected him to take. Abraham did not take it. He paid the number Ephron named, without negotiating it down, in the hearing of the Hittites, and by the standard weights everybody in the market already used and could verify.
He removed every ambiguity from the transaction on purpose, at his own cost, when he had leverage and sentiment and a free offer on the table. Four thousand years later, nobody can raise a question about that purchase, which was the point.
"He who walks righteously and speaks uprightly, who despises the gain of oppressions, who shakes his hands, lest they hold a bribe" — Isaiah 33:15
Shakes his hands — a physical picture of a man getting something off himself. Not resisting a temptation he is savoring. Getting it off his hands, the way a man shakes off something that landed on him.
Legal Is a Floor, Not a Standard
There is a question that tells you everything about the man asking it: "Is it legal?"
Not because the question is bad. It is a necessary question and a man should know the answer. But when it is the last question — when the answer comes back yes and the discussion ends — the man has told the room exactly where his ceiling is, and it is set by whoever happened to write the statute.
Compliance and ethics are not the same instrument. Compliance is a floor built by legislators, always behind the practice it governs, always written after somebody found the previous loophole, and always at the mercy of who paid for the drafting. Everything genuinely new is legal for a while.
"Woe to those who decree iniquitous decrees, and the writers who keep writing oppression, to turn aside the needy from justice and to rob the poor of my people of their right" — Isaiah 10:1-2
Notice who is condemned there. Not thieves. Writers. Men at desks, producing documents, in full compliance with the process, doing paperwork. The oppression in that verse is entirely lawful — it is the law — and it is being manufactured by clerks who go home at five and think of themselves as professionals, which they are.
A man who wants a standard above the floor has one available, and it does not require any special training.
"If you build a new house, you shall make a parapet for your roof, that you may not bring the guilt of blood upon your house, if anyone should fall from it"
— Deuteronomy 22:8
Nobody has fallen. Nobody is going to fall, probably. The person who might fall has not been identified, may not be born, and will never know the railing is there. The builder is charged with putting it up anyway, at his own expense, for a stranger, against a harm that will most likely never occur.
That is the standard above compliance, stated as a building code: you are responsible for the foreseeable harm your work could do to someone you will never meet.
Nobody in the Chain Did Anything Wrong
Here is the thing that makes ethics different from personal morality, and it is why this room cannot be handled with the tools from the last three.
A moral failure has an author. An ethical failure at scale frequently does not.
Twelve people touch a decision. One writes an assumption into a model. One approves the model without reading the assumption, because that is not his job. One builds a product on the approved model. One writes the copy for it. One signs off on the copy because legal cleared it. One sells it. One processes the paperwork. Nobody in that chain did a single thing they would be ashamed to describe to their family, and the output damages ten thousand people.
Ask any of them afterward and every one of them will be telling the truth. That wasn't my call. I flagged it. I only handled the back end. That decision was made above me.
This is why the man who has only ever practiced personal integrity is defenseless in a system. His entire instrument is calibrated to did I do it, and the answer is genuinely no.
"Throw in your lot among us; we will all have one purse" — Proverbs 1:14
That is the invitation, and it is worth noticing how attractive it is written. Nobody says come commit a crime. They say one purse — shared upside, shared risk, everybody in it together, and nobody individually holding the thing. The pot is the mechanism. Once a man is drawing from it he is inside it, and every argument he would have made on the way in becomes an argument against himself.
"The partner of a thief hates his own life; he hears the curse, but discloses nothing" — Proverbs 29:24
He hears the curse. He is present for it. Somebody in the room says the sentence out loud that makes the thing plain, and he registers it, and he does not disclose. That is the moment. It is almost never dramatic and it is almost always audible.
So the question a man in a system has to run is not did I do it. It is narrower and much harder to escape:
What did I know, when did I know it, and what did I do in the week after I knew?
The Distance
The last thing that makes this territory dangerous is geometry. He never meets them.
The man who cheats his neighbor has to see his neighbor. The feedback is immediate, personal, and physically uncomfortable, and it corrects most men without any moral reasoning at all. The man who cheats forty thousand customers by a small amount each never meets one of them, never sees a face, and receives his share as a number that arrives on schedule with everyone else's.
"Behold, the wages of the laborers who mowed your fields, which you kept back by fraud, are crying out against you" — James 5:4
The wages are crying out. Not the laborers — they have moved on, or given up, or cannot afford the fight. The withheld money itself is making the noise, because the people it belonged to have no standing and no volume and nobody is listening to them.
That is what scale does. It removes the human being from the transaction and leaves a number, and a number is very easy to be reasonable about.
The counterweight is unglamorous and it works: name one. Not the category, not the market, not the user base. One person, with a name, who will be handed the thing he is about to send. If he cannot picture that person without discomfort, he has his answer, and he had it before he asked.
The Rooms Under This One
Three rooms open off this one. They run from the standard itself, to the wrong men do by agreeing with each other, to the wrong men do with force.
Christian Business Ethics — the standard itself, worked out where a man actually earns: what is owed to a customer who cannot judge the work, where money may and may not be put to earn, and how a man runs a company without either blessing greed or treating profit as filth.
Collusion — the wrong done by agreement. Two or more parties quietly arranging things so that whoever is absent pays for it. This is the most common shape serious commercial wrongdoing takes, and the one that most reliably feels like loyalty while it is happening.
Violence — the wrong done by force. Where force is legitimate, where it stops being legitimate, and the specific self-deception of the man who has convinced himself that what he wanted to do anyway was justified.
The argument that there is no standard here to violate at all — that ethics is local, negotiable, and finally a matter of whose framework you happen to be standing in — is handled in one place rather than two, back under the compass: Moral Relativism.
Where This Leads
"For the stone will cry out from the wall, and the beam from the woodwork respond" — Habakkuk 2:11
That is said about a man who built something impressive with money that was not honestly gotten. The image is that the building itself testifies — the stone he laid and the beam he set turn on him and answer, because they know what they were bought with.
It is a strange picture and it is the right one for this room, because everything here gets built into something. The estimate becomes a relationship. The margin becomes a policy. The exception becomes how the department operates. A man does not accumulate ethical failures; he constructs with them, and then he has to live in the building and so does everybody who works for him.
And every one of the wrongs in this room needed one thing to work: the other man's ignorance. Remove it — let him see the real number, the real terms, the real margin — and most of it becomes impossible in a single afternoon.
Which raises the next question, and it is a more personal one. A man does not always need the other party to be ignorant. Sometimes he only needs him to be moved. Everything above was done to a man's interests through documents and systems and distance. The next room is what a man does directly, face to face, using nothing but words, to get another human being to choose what he wants him to choose — and whether the man on the other side still had a real choice when it was over.
→ Continue to Influence and Persuasion